Security for LLM and agent systems

  1. Home
  2. AI
  3. Agent, RAG, MCP & ML
  4. Security for LLM and agent systems

Introduction

Generative features inherit the same engineering bar as any internet-facing service—with extra attack surface from untrusted text in context, tools and MCP servers callable by the model, and retrieval that can pull in poisoned or private material. The checklist below matches the Security lens used on Production Agent-RAG Architectures: data ingest and index, API and edge, LLM and prompt safety, then privacy and operations.

Data ingestion: cleaning and sanitization

Everything you chunk, embed, or index is attacker-controlled surface once it can enter a prompt. Ingestion should assume messy sources, deliberate poisoning, and compliance constraints.

AI API security

Model and orchestration endpoints are high-cost, high-blast-radius APIs: abuse for scraping, credential theft, and chained tool calls.

Input handling for AI workloads

Chat, uploads, and retrieved spans share one context unless you separate policy from data—where indirect prompt injection and tool abuse actually land.

Privacy & operations

Conclusion

Ingest, API edge, prompt surface, and privacy ops are one system: weak ingestion poisons retrieval; weak edge control leaks keys; weak prompt boundaries let tools misfire; weak logging hides abuse. Revisit the checklist whenever you change models, corpora, or tool allowlists—and keep it aligned with how you ship Agent-RAG in production.