OpenAI Latest Embeddings Explained
The video is in Bulgarian
In the era of AI-driven search, recommendation systems, and large language models (LLMs), embedding models play a crucial role in understanding and organizing information. Instead of relying on traditional keyword-based search, embeddings convert text into numerical vectors, capturing semantic meaning and enabling more intelligent information retrieval.
OpenAI’s Ada v2 embedding model stands out as one of the most efficient and cost-effective solutions for generating high-dimensional vector representations of text. It is optimized for semantic search, clustering, and recommendation systems, making it a powerful tool for AI applications.
This article explores the OpenAI Ada embedding model, how it generates embeddings, the best use cases, and how it compares to alternative models like SBERT and MiniLM. Whether you’re building retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems, AI-powered search engines, or personalized recommendations, understanding embeddings is essential.

Distance Metrics for Embedding Models
When working with OpenAI's Ada embeddings, choosing the right similarity metric is crucial for accurate comparisons. The primary and alternative metrics include:
✅ Primary Similarity Metrics
- 🔥Cosine Similarity → Measures the angle between two vectors, ensuring scale-invariant comparisons.
- 🔥Dot Product → Computes similarity by multiplying vector components, commonly used in retrieval systems.
🛠️ Possible Alternative Metrics
While Ada is optimized for cosine and dot product similarities, other distance measures can be used in certain scenarios:
- 🔥Euclidean Distance (L2 Distance) → Measures absolute distance but is not ideal for high-dimensional embeddings.
- 🔥Manhattan Distance (L1 Distance) → Computes distance along each dimension separately; less common in NLP tasks.
- 🔥Hamming Distance → Used for binary embeddings, but not applicable to Ada's floating-point vectors.
🚀 Key Takeaway: Cosine Similarity and Dot Product are the best-suited metrics for comparing Ada embeddings, ensuring efficient and meaningful retrieval.
Best Use Cases for OpenAI's Text-Embedding-Ada-002
OpenAI’s Ada embeddings unlock powerful capabilities in various AI-driven applications. Here are the best use cases where Ada excels:
✅ Top Applications of Ada Embeddings
- 🔥Semantic Search → Retrieve similar documents, FAQs, and knowledge base articles with high accuracy.
- 🔥RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) → Enhance LLM responses by fetching the most relevant context.
- 🔥Recommendation Systems → Suggest products, content, or articles based on text similarity.
- 🔥Text Clustering & Classification → Organize, group, and categorize similar text for efficient analysis.
- 🔥Anomaly Detection → Identify outliers in text-based datasets for fraud detection or error analysis.
🚀 Key Takeaway: Ada embeddings power advanced NLP applications, enabling more accurate retrieval, classification, and personalization in AI-driven systems.
Optimizations & Considerations for OpenAI's Text-Embedding-Ada-002
To maximize the performance of OpenAI's Ada embeddings, consider these key optimizations for improving retrieval accuracy and efficiency.
✅ How to Improve Retrieval Accuracy
- 🔥Fine-Tune Embeddings → While OpenAI doesn't support fine-tuning yet, models like Cohere or SBERT offer customization options.
- 🔥Use Hybrid Search → Combine keyword-based search with vector search for enhanced relevance.
- 🔥Choose the Right Vector Database → Leverage specialized vector databases like Weaviate, Pinecone, or Qdrant for faster and scalable retrieval.
🚀 Key Takeaway: Combining vector search with hybrid methods and the right infrastructure ensures optimal accuracy and efficiency when using Ada embeddings.
Trade-offs & Alternatives to OpenAI's Text-Embedding-Ada-002
While OpenAI's Ada embeddings offer high-quality representations, there are some trade-offs to consider when choosing the right embedding model for your needs.
❌ Limitations of OpenAI Ada
- 🔥Not Trainable → Unlike open-source models like SBERT or MiniLM, Ada does not support fine-tuning.
- 🔥API-Dependent → Requires OpenAI API calls, meaning it cannot be self-hosted.
- 🔥Cost Per Call → While more affordable than GPT-4, it is still a paid service.
✅ Alternatives to OpenAI Ada
If Ada’s limitations are a concern, consider these alternatives depending on your use case:
- 🔥Sentence-BERT (SBERT) → Great for fine-tuned sentence similarity tasks.
- 🔥MiniLM → A lightweight alternative for efficient text embeddings.
- 🔥Cohere Embed → Offers API-based embeddings with fine-tuning options.
- 🔥Hugging Face DistilBERT → Open-source and self-hosted for flexible deployments.
When Should You Use OpenAI Ada?
🚀 Use Ada if you need a high-quality, plug-and-play embedding solution with minimal setup.
Code Samples for OpenAI's Text-Embedding-Ada-002
Code Samples for OpenAI's Text-Embedding-Ada-002 with TypeScript
npm install openai dotenv
import { Configuration, OpenAIApi } from "openai";
import dotenv from "dotenv";
dotenv.config();
const openai = new OpenAIApi(
new Configuration({
apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY, // Store your API key in .env
})
);
async function generateEmbedding(text: string) {
const response = await openai.createEmbedding({
model: "text-embedding-ada-002",
input: text,
});
return response.data.data[0].embedding;
}
// Example Usage
const text = "What is the meaning of life?";
generateEmbedding(text)
.then((embedding) => console.log("Embedding:", embedding))
.catch((error) => console.error("Error:", error));
Code Samples for OpenAI's Text-Embedding-Ada-002 with Python
pip install openai python-dotenv
import openai
import os
from dotenv import load_dotenv
# Load API key from .env file
load_dotenv()
openai.api_key = os.getenv("OPENAI_API_KEY")
def generate_embedding(text):
response = openai.Embedding.create(
model="text-embedding-ada-002",
input=text
)
return response["data"][0]["embedding"]
# Example Usage
text = "What is the meaning of life?"
embedding = generate_embedding(text)
print("Embedding:", embedding)
🎯 Conclusion By providing both TypeScript and Python examples, developers can seamlessly integrate OpenAI’s Text-Embedding-Ada-002 into their React, Node.js , and Python-based applications. Whether you're building semantic search engines, recommendation systems, or AI-powered assistants, Ada embeddings provide a fast, scalable, and cost-effective solution.
text-embedding-3-small Explained
text-embedding-3-small is a lightweight, high-performance embedding model released by OpenAI in January 2024. It’s part of the new text-embedding-3 family — designed to convert text into high-dimensional vector representations, also known as embeddings.
These embeddings capture semantic meaning, so that similar texts are placed close together in vector space — making it ideal for tasks like:
- 🔥 Semantic Search
- 🔥 Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)
- 🔥 Clustering & classification
- 🔥 Chat memory and context compression
- 🔥 Text deduplication
- 🔥 Recommendation systems
Why is it special?
It supports custom dimensions — you can choose between 256, 512, 1024, or 1536. It's fast, cost-effective, and high-quality, outperforming the previous leader ada-002 on most tasks. It handles above 8000 tokens per request — that's a lot of content per chunk. (8192 tokens) And the best part? It’s built for scale — making it perfect for production systems like:
- 🔥 Knowledge assistants
- 🔥 Search engines
- 🔥 Document indexing tools
- 🔥 and even RAG pipelines for LLMs like GPT-4
How does it perform?
On the MTEB benchmark, text-embedding-3-small delivers state-of-the-art performance for its size and cost — rivaling even larger models like e5-large and bge-large, but with far better speed and affordability.
...Let’s take a look at where text-embedding-3-small fits into the current embedding landscape. With an MTEB score between 61 and 63%, it outperforms OpenAI’s previous model ada-002, and holds its own against powerful open models like e5-base-v2. While it may not top the charts like e5-large-v2 or bge-large, it offers a strong balance between quality and ease of use, especially in production systems where latency, token limits, and API integration matter.
In many real-world applications, you don’t need the biggest or the most powerful model — you need the best balance between quality, speed, and cost. And that’s exactly where text-embedding-3-small shines. It’s like the Toyota Corolla of embeddings: not the flashiest, but reliable, efficient, and gets the job done at scale.
Even though it's labeled ‘small’, this model is actually competing with some of the top dogs. For example, e5-large-v2 has a retrieval score of 74.1%, clustering of 64.3%, and classification at 57.4%. Now compare that to text-embedding-3-small — it’s right there in the mix, at 70.2%, 61.2%, and 55.3% respectively.
On top of that, it supports variable dimensionality — from 256 all the way up to 1536 — meaning you can choose whether to optimize for speed, accuracy, or memory. And because it’s fast and lightweight, it’s perfect for production-grade applications like semantic search, recommendation engines, RAG systems, and chat memory compression.
Remember how popular ada-002 was? Well, this model has basically made it obsolete — performing better on nearly every benchmark, and doing so with more control and less cost.
If you’re building a system that needs: Fast and cheap embeddings, Reasonable accuracy across tasks, Easy deployment at scale, …then text-embedding-3-small should be high on your list.
# 🐍 Python (with openai SDK)
import openai
openai.api_key = "your-api-key"
response = openai.Embedding.create(
model="text-embedding-3-small",
input="This is a test string",
dimensions=512 # Optional: choose 256, 512, 1024, or 1536
)
embedding = response["data"][0]["embedding"]
print(embedding)
This Python snippet uses OpenAI’s SDK to generate a vector embedding of a text string using the text-embedding-3-small model. The dimensions parameter lets us control the size of the embedding, which is useful for optimizing storage or performance. You can now easily convert any text into a dense vector with just a few lines of code—perfect for search, clustering, or semantic similarity tasks.
// 🟨 JavaScript (Node.js with openai SDK)
import OpenAI from "openai";
const openai = new OpenAI({
apiKey: "your-api-key"
});
const response = await openai.embeddings.create({
model: "text-embedding-3-small",
input: "This is a test string",
dimensions: 512
});
console.log(response.data[0].embedding);
And here’s the same embedding process in JavaScript using the OpenAI SDK—perfect if you're building with Node.js or working on a full-stack app.
// 🦦 Go (with openai-go SDK)
package main
import ("context", "fmt", "github.com/sashabaranov/go-openai")
func main() {
client := openai.NewClient("your-api-key")
resp, err := client.CreateEmbeddings(context.Background(), openai.EmbeddingRequest{
Model: openai.TextEmbedding3Small,
Input: []string{"This is a test string"},
Dimensions: 512, // Optional
})
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
fmt.Println(resp.Data[0].Embedding)
}
And here it is in Go using the openai-go SDK—ideal for backend services or high-performance applications that need embeddings.
So whether you’re building a semantic search engine, compressing chat history, or powering a RAG system behind your LLM — text-embedding-3-small hits a sweet spot of quality, speed, and price.
It may be small by name — but it’s powerful, scalable, and ready for real-world AI workloads.
Introducing Text-Embedding-3-Large
When accuracy is non-negotiable, meet text-embedding-3-large.
This model boasts a larger network and fixed embedding sizes — for example, 2,048 or 4,096 dimensions — plus a context window up to 16,384 tokens.
It’s roughly three times the cost of 3-small (around $0.00013 per token) but delivers a 67–70% average score on the MTEB benchmark, outperforming smaller variants and even Ada-002.
On-screen comparison table:
Spec | 3-Small | 3-Large |
---|---|---|
Dimensions | 256–1,536 (custom) | 2,048 or 4,096 (fixed) |
Context window | Up to 8,192 tokens | Up to 16,384 tokens |
Cost | ~$0.00002 per token | ~$0.00013 per token |
MTEB score | 61–63% | 67–70% |
OpenAI hosts this model, so you benefit from managed infrastructure and low-latency inference without juggling GPUs yourself.
Customization is where 3-Small shines: tweak dimensions to match your storage and speed needs.
If you need plug-and-play precision, 3-Large’s fixed dimensionGs guarantee consistent results.
Remember: smaller vectors are cheaper and faster; larger ones capture richer semantics.
Let’s look at two demos:
For example
A Product Search that uses (3-Small): Imagine, A retailer uses custom 512-dimensional embeddings to power a lightning-fast semantic search across thousands of SKUs, delivering accurate results under 50ms. or Chatbot Memory that uses (3-Large): Imagine, A customer support bot retrieves context from past user messages in a 10,000-token conversation, ensuring coherent, personalized replies. Watch how 3-Large captures nuances that smaller embeddings might miss, especially for long dialogues.
Upgrading from Ada-002?
If you want to upgrade from ada-002, It’s as easy as swapping model names. But watch out for dimension mismatches — 3-Small’s dynamic dimensions and 3-Large’s fixed sizes differ from Ada-002’s 1,536 dimensions. Also, monitor your costs: 3-Small is cheaper per token, while 3-Large can be pricier but offers higher quality.
Best Practices & Tips
- 🔥 Normalize your embeddings (L2 normalization) for consistent similarity scores.
- 🔥 Batch your requests to maximize throughput within rate limits.
- 🔥 Choose the right index — Faiss for on-prem, probably Pinecone or Qdrant for managed vector databases.
- 🔥 Monitor drift: as your data evolves, periodically retrain or re-embed.